<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: LVM + Moving Around Drives = Unhappy?</title> <atom:link href="http://blog.charlies-server.com/2006/09/26/lvm-moving-around-drives-unhappy/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://blog.charlies-server.com/2006/09/26/lvm-moving-around-drives-unhappy</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 20:48:48 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Hasan</title><link>http://blog.charlies-server.com/2006/09/26/lvm-moving-around-drives-unhappy/comment-page-1#comment-127</link> <dc:creator>Hasan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 14:00:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://newblog.charlies-server.com/2006/09/26/lvm-moving-around-drives-unhappy/#comment-127</guid> <description>No such similar issues here yet, though I haven&#039;t really taken a close look at it (will do so and report any relevant findings here, if there are any). What&#039;s the CPU in your server?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No such similar issues here yet, though I haven&#8217;t really taken a close look at it (will do so and report any relevant findings here, if there are any). What&#8217;s the CPU in your server?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: steve</title><link>http://blog.charlies-server.com/2006/09/26/lvm-moving-around-drives-unhappy/comment-page-1#comment-126</link> <dc:creator>steve</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 09:45:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://newblog.charlies-server.com/2006/09/26/lvm-moving-around-drives-unhappy/#comment-126</guid> <description>greetings! I use lvm to manage virtual machine storage on my cluster of  xen host machines, for several reasons: it abstracts nicely from the underlying media, is inherently well supported by xen, and is easily migrated from host to host.  However, under high i/o load, it sometimes appears that the kernel module is a (slight) bottleneck.  This is not a major issue, but perplexing nonetheless, given that - while expected to be marginally slower than raw disk access - lvm is fairly speedy.  I&#039;m using sata II and a tyan server board; I do not expect the hardware to be a limitation. Have you by any chance noticed similar issues?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>greetings! I use lvm to manage virtual machine storage on my cluster of  xen host machines, for several reasons: it abstracts nicely from the underlying media, is inherently well supported by xen, and is easily migrated from host to host.  However, under high i/o load, it sometimes appears that the kernel module is a (slight) bottleneck.  This is not a major issue, but perplexing nonetheless, given that &#8211; while expected to be marginally slower than raw disk access &#8211; lvm is fairly speedy.  I&#8217;m using sata II and a tyan server board; I do not expect the hardware to be a limitation. Have you by any chance noticed similar issues?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)

Served from: blog.charlies-server.com @ 2012-02-11 00:47:46 -->
